
Orders can be made finalising property matters between parties to a marriage under section 79 of the Family Law Act 1975.
In considering what order (if any) should be made under section 79 in property settlement proceedings, the court must:
It is often believed that property settlement involves a complicated accounting exercise about who spend money on what during the relationship, however that is incorrect. The Court usually divides the property pool according to the factors mentioned above which it considers what order would be just and equitable in the circumstances.
Rule 4.01 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 provides that before starting a proceeding, each prospective party to the proceeding must ordinarily comply with the pre-action procedures. The court regards the requirements set out in the pre-action procedures as the standard and appropriate approach for a person to take before filing an application in a court.
If a proceeding is subsequently started, the court may consider whether these requirements have been met and, if not, any consequences for non-compliance. The court may take into account compliance and non-compliance with the pre-action procedures when it is making orders about case management and considering orders for costs.
The pre-action procedures provide that each prospective party to a proceeding in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is required to make a genuine effort to resolve the dispute before filing an application to start proceedings by following the pre-action procedures.
Under the pre-action procedures, you must make full and frank disclosure of all information relevant to the issues in dispute in a timely manner including the exchange copies of documents in your possession or control relevant to an issue in dispute as soon as practicable on learning of the dispute.
At all stages during the pre-action procedures and, if a proceeding is started, during the conduct of the proceedings, the parties must have regard to the following:
(a) the best interests of any child, including the need to protect and safeguard the child against risk or harm;
(b) facilitating a meaningful relationship between a parent and the child, if appropriate, and the benefits of effective co-parenting;
(c) the potential damage to a child involved in a dispute between the parents, particularly if the child is encouraged to take sides or take part in the dispute;
(d) the best way of exploring options for settlement, identifying the issues as soon as possible, and seeking resolution of them;
(e) the need to avoid protracted, unnecessary, hostile and inflammatory exchanges;
(f) the impact of correspondence on the intended reader (in particular, on the parties);
(g) the need to seek only orders that are reasonably achievable on the evidence and that are consistent with the current law;
(h) the principle of proportionality and the need to control costs because it is unacceptable for the costs of any proceeding to be disproportionate to the financial value of the subject matter of the dispute;
(i) the duty to make full and frank disclosure of all material facts, documents and other information relevant to the dispute.
Sterling Law can be contacted by phone on 07 3667 8213, or by email: office@sterlinglawqld.com